Statement

Stay NJ Reforms Are a Step Forward — But Renters Are Still Left Out


Lowering the income cap to $200,000 keeps the program's largest benefits out of reach for the wealthiest seniors

Published on Jun 30, 2026 in Tax and Budget

Today the state legislature voted to approve reforms to Stay NJ, a senior homeowner subsidy, lowering the income cap to $200,000 and reducing benefits for higher-income enrollees. This change will maintain benefits for roughly 90 percent of seniors, while targeting the highest benefits of $6,500 for only those seniors with $100,000 or less in income. This aligns with prior recommendations by New Jersey Policy Perspective to reduce the cost of the program, ultimately reducing program costs by $450 million annually.

In response, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“These much-needed reforms will prevent the state from sending tax relief to very-high-income households, while focusing the benefit on less wealthy seniors. By adopting measures that focus aid on low- and moderate-income seniors, the bill creates a more progressive structure, directing more money to those who need it most.

“That said, serious issues remain with the program, namely its large overall cost and its focus on homeowners. Senior renters are more likely to be housing insecure due to rent increases and eviction, and are also more likely to be low-income and Black or Hispanic/Latinx. Given the state’s rising rents and housing costs, the program’s renter gap is a real problem. And with a $1.4 billion structural deficit and a price tag of more than $740 million, the legislature may find itself revisiting this program again before long.”

###

Author

  • Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, has worked on child and family policy advocacy in New Jersey since 2014. Most recently, he coordinated New Jersey’s nonprofit campaign for a complete count of the 2020 Census. Additionally, Peter has written reports on topics including: childhood lead poisoning prevention, chronic absenteeism from school, teacher certification, and summer meals.

    Prior to New Jersey Policy Perspective, Peter was Policy Counsel at Advocates for Children of New Jersey, where he also served as a Skadden Fellow from 2014-16. Peter received his JD from Yale Law School and his Bachelors of Arts from Indiana University-Bloomington. He served as a law clerk for Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Like this publication?

Please consider supporting NJPP.

Your support powers the research, communications, and partnership building necessary to make policy work for people, so every New Jerseyan can achieve their goal for a healthy and vibrant life.