Report

Sleepwalking into Catastrophe


New Jersey’s Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Failed to Meet the Moment

Published on Jul 8, 2025 in Tax and Budget

Throughout the budget process — from Governor Murphy's proposal to the public hearings to the revenue projections — one major threat loomed over state lawmakers: the federal reconciliation bill’s cuts to Medicaid, food assistance, and other critical programs. Given their public statements opposing these cuts, the state budget should have been an opportunity to build defenses against these cuts, begin raising revenues from wealthy individuals and corporations, and avoid short-term giveaways.

Instead, the budget process went on autopilot. Leaders cut back revenue increases and dipped deeper into the state's cash reserves, as though there would be no federal cuts at all. As has happened in prior years, new expansions in corporate tax credits sailed through committee hearings while the expensive Stay NJ senior homeowner subsidy was preserved without even modest changes to reduce its overall cost to the state. The budget also continued the unfortunate tradition of using dedicated funds to patch one-year budget gaps, including an expanded raid of the Clean Energy Fund to fund both New Jersey Transit’s general operating expenses and the General Fund.

This budget could and should have been a moment of courage — a governor’s final budget, a legislature that has stated its desire to protect the state’s residents from devastating cuts. But instead, the state’s leaders delayed any preparation for federal cuts until after they had already become law. The difficult decisions will not be easier later.

Below is a short summary of NJPP’s budget priorities and their final status in the Appropriations Act.

NJPP FY26 Budget Priority

Was it included in the Governor’s Budget?

Protect the surplus and close the deficit  Partially Included. The projected annual budget shortfall has been reduced from $2.1 billion in the FY 2025 budget bill to $1.5 billion through some tax increases and budget cuts. The budget bill retains cash reserves of nearly $6.8 billion, but still cuts deeper into the reserves to pay basic expenses.
Fully fund pensions
and schools
 Yes. The governor and legislature continued the state’s commitment to fully funding pensions and the K-12 school funding formula.
Raise revenues to balance
the budget
 Partially Included. The final state budget does include increases in revenue, including the increase in fees on property sales over $2 million and increased taxes on online gambling. However, these increases raise less money than the governor’s original proposals, leading to the budget drawing more heavily on cash reserves.
Maintain StayNJ’s guardrails, specifically the original spending rules that require a healthy budget surplus  No. StayNJ, an expensive subsidy program that disproportionately benefits wealthy senior homeowners, requires a 12 percent surplus target before payments can go out. This budget continues to fund StayNJ and assumes payments will go out in 2026, even though the surplus is now well below 12 percent.
Maintain funding for services for immigrants  Yes. Thankfully, the proposal preserves funding levels for programs such as Cover All Kids, which provides health insurance for children regardless of immigration status, and legal services for immigrant adults and children. The budget also doubles funding for the Office of New Americans, which connects immigrants to services for which they or their families may be eligible.
Expand and improve
tax credits for working
families
 No. Unfortunately, the final budget included no expansion of the Child Tax Credit or Earned Income Tax Credit to help working families afford the increasing cost of living in the state.
Increase benefits in WorkFirst NJ to reduce poverty  No. Similarly, there was no expansion of the benefit amount for WorkFirst NJ, which provides cash assistance to low-income households.
Expand affordable health insurance options  Partially Included. As noted above, the budget continued to fund Cover All Kids, dedicating $165 million to the program to keep pace with enrollment. However, there were no other proposals to expand access or eligibility to state-funded health insurance programs.
Keep the Corporate Transit
Fee funding transit
 Yes. Corporate Transit Fee funds were directed only to New Jersey Transit and not to the general fund or footing the bill for other programs.
Use the Clean Energy Fund
only for clean energy projects
 No. In fact, lawmakers expanded the raids on the Clean Energy Fund to over $190m to be used for basic New Jersey Transit operations and to the General Fund.
End predatory prison communication fees  No. The budget did not include any funding to reduce or eliminate the cost of prison communication fees, leaving families to bear the $15 million burden of communicating with their incarcerated loved ones.

All citations to the Appropriations Act (A-5800/S-2026) and Scoresheet unless otherwise indicated.

To learn more about policy solutions that NJPP recommends to build a more equitable state, read Blueprint for a Strong and Resilient New Jersey.

 

Authors

  • Alex Ambrose, Policy Analyst, researches policies with a focus on climate justice and transportation.

    Prior to NJPP, Alex served as Policy Associate at the Association of NJ Environmental Commissions (ANJEC) and Policy Assistant at New Jersey League of Conservation Voters (NJLCV). In those roles, she worked on policy and legislation to protect clean water, preserve open space, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions with an emphasis on equity. Most recently, she worked to pass plastic pollution legislation including the statewide single-use bag ban.

    Alex currently serves as the Chair of Clinton Township Environmental Commission and is pursuing her Master's in Public Administration at Rutgers University. She received her Bachelor of Science in Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources from Rutgers University with a minor in Environmental Geomatics.

    Email: ambrose@njpp.org |
    Follow Alex on Twitter

  • Erica BolandDigital Communications Manager, develops and executes NJPP’s digital and video strategy, translating complex policy topics into stories that entertain as much as they inform.

  • Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, has worked on child and family policy advocacy in New Jersey since 2014. Most recently, he coordinated New Jersey’s nonprofit campaign for a complete count of the 2020 Census. Additionally, Peter has written reports on topics including: childhood lead poisoning prevention, chronic absenteeism from school, teacher certification, and summer meals.

    Prior to New Jersey Policy Perspective, Peter was Policy Counsel at Advocates for Children of New Jersey, where he also served as a Skadden Fellow from 2014-16. Peter received his JD from Yale Law School and his Bachelors of Arts from Indiana University-Bloomington. He served as a law clerk for Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

  • Dr. Brittany L. Holom, Senior Policy Analyst, is a researcher and lecturer whose interests include health care system reform, the differential impact of health policies across socioeconomic groups, and the role of social and cultural factors in the access to and use of health care services, as well as health outcomes.
    Prior to joining NJPP in May 2020, Brittany taught classes on human security, health care systems, post-Soviet politics, human rights, and development at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and in the Department of Political Science at The College of New Jersey. She also served as an AmeriCorps VISTA member at the Puerto Rican Action Board in New Brunswick and has recently volunteered at one of New Jersey’s COVID-19 testing sites as part of the Medical Reserve Corps.
    Brittany received her Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University in 2018, where her dissertation explored healthcare reforms in the former Soviet countries and the impact of decision making at critical junctures on long-term institutional trajectories. She received her Master’s in Politics from Princeton in 2013 and her Bachelor of Arts in Russian Language and Literature and Political Science from the University of Notre Dame in 2011.
    Email: holom (at) njpp.org

  • Marleina Ubel, State Policy Fellow, has been a dedicated advocate for underrepresented groups throughout her academic career. She began her undergraduate work at Valencia College and earned a transfer scholarship to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where she earned a B.A. in Philosophy. As a PIKSI fellow, she spent a summer at MIT challenging demographic disparities in institutions of higher learning. She is currently pursuing her M.S.W. in Management and Policy at Rutgers University. Her most recent research has focused on the negative impacts of public policy on low-income fathers. Marleina lives in Lambertville with her husband and daughter.

Like this publication?

Please consider supporting NJPP.

Your support powers the research, communications, and partnership building necessary to make policy work for people, so every New Jerseyan can achieve their goal for a healthy and vibrant life.